Alexandra W. Shortridge, Senior Counsel

Publications & Media

“Will Wisconsin Courts Interpret Indemnity Agreements and Additional-Insured Endorsements Differently in Light of Deepwater Horizon?”

Wisconsin Civil Trial Journal - Summer 2015 - Volume 13 - Number 2 By Patrick S. Nolan, Alexandra W. Shortridge

Below is an excerpt:

Two primary mechanisms for allocating risk in any business transaction are the indemnity agreements and additional-insured insured requirements contained in an underlying commercial contract. These agreements may trigger a third mechanism - the additional-insured endorsement. This trifecta is endemic to construction, real estate, manufacturing, distribution, engineering, and other enterprises where business relationships necessarily create potential liability to third parties. The indemnity agreement, additional-insured requirement, and additional-insured endorsement, often used in tandem and often designed to protect one of the parties to the contract, each provide a separate avenue for contracting parties to protect themselves and recoup losses sustained in the course of their business relationships.

Originally published in Wisconsin Civil Trial Journal, Summer 2015

Payment Portal

You are leaving the Quarles & Brady website and being directed to the bill presentment and paying service offered by a third party provider. If you do not wish to continue to the site, click Close or use the Back button on your web browser to return the Quarles & Brady website.