Quarles & Brady Victory in Patent and Trade Secret Case Highlighted in Article
Below is an excerpt:
The litigation was related to allegations by WTS Paradigm, which was seeking a declaratory judgment from the court that it had not infringed on certain EdgeAQ configuration-related patents and had not misappropriated any of EdgeAQ’s trade secrets.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, WTS Paradigm will not pay any compensation to EdgeAQ and WTS Paradigm will not seek sanctions and attorneys’ fees.
In addition, in the settlement agreement, EdgeAQ provided to WTS Paradigm, its customers, and end users a Covenant Not to Sue for infringement of any of EdgeAQ’s configurator-related patents, as well as a GDSN-related patent.
WTS Paradigm was represented in the case by Quarles & Brady, LLP.