Web Analytics

Ted Hollis Shares Perspective in HRD Article on Remote Pay Based on Location

Media Mention

Ted Hollis, a Labor & Employment partner based in the firm’s Indianapolis office, provided his perspective on the topic of paying remote employees based on their geographical location in a Human Resources Director article.

While some argue this is necessary based on where an employee lives -- such as California, where the cost of living is much higher -- others believe salary and pay should be based on experience and skill set. However, Hollis provides a different theory about why varied pay could become an issue.

An excerpt:

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, there are two ways you can establish a discrimination claim: disparate treatment, which is when an employer outright treats an employee or candidate differently because of that person's race, religion, color, sex, national origin, etc.; and disparate impact, in which a policy that’s neutral on its face is applied in a discriminatory manner.

“For instance, let’s say one area that’s lower paying happens to be disproportionately minority-populated,” Hollis told HRD. “I could see a disparate impact theory claim being brought by an African American applicant or employee, alleging ‘you say it’s geography, but in practice it’s having a negative effect on people based on race.’”


Related People

Related Capabilities

Follow Quarles

Subscribe Media Contact
Back to Main Content

We use cookies to provide you with the best user experience on our website and to analyze statistics related to our website. To understand more about how we use cookies, or for instructions to change your preference and browser settings, please see our Privacy Notice. Please note that if you choose to reject cookies, doing so may impair some of our website's functionality.